Hamkawa!!

Ok, so I know I haven't been posting much but I have been thinking A LOT about my new ideology Domestica and I'm starting to reflect on solitarism as well.

FIRST OFF- Solitarism and Domestica are not political ideologies and don't fall anywhere on a political map.

Yeahhhhh,,,, I kinda realized this WAY too late. Both Solitarism and Domestica deal with how we treat others around us as well as how we treat ourselves. They're societal ideologies! They have nothing to do with the government and I'm kinda sorry for conflating them with that. I've also made a summary of what each of them means.



Domestica- Appeals to psychology and accepts humans as animals, promotes our domestication in order to gain peace. If there is a problem, fix it or stop it.

Solitarism (god I gotta rename that one)- seeks to achieve peace through avoidance and promotes independence from others. If there is a problem, either avoid it or get rid of it.



As for this blog: I want to go back to posting more and I want to start looking at other people's blogs as well. I'll also be uploading my art onto here and Pinterest for promotion as I am very invested in Domestica right now.
Stay Tuned!!!!

In modern times I have seen many concerns with males and transgender individuals in typically female spaces or those with masculine reproductive organs. But why?

Other than misandry many women have developed a strong distrust or phobia towards males due to them tending to treat females, those with feminine parts, or even birth males with feminine frames or behavior (including multiple forms of transgender folk).

The reason for this is due to male culture, how guys are raised, and how they learn to act to be more specific. Any guy who has even a SCENT of femininity to them is bullied shunned and outcasted, and like I said before, humans are prone to attack others that are different from them. Thus, feminine males (or domesticated ones rather) are extremely hard to find, forming resentment in women from their often inconsiderate behavior. Furthermore, crime ends up being higher in males (once again, due to how they are raised and the attitudes they develop from then onward), causing a reactive fear of them.

What's even worse is that this prejudice feeds into itself, women see themselves so differently from males that they end up bullying other males or those with masculine reproductive organs for being feminine, strengthening the negative aspects of masculine culture and eradicating or driving off people of that nature simply for not meeting the negative stereotype.

Here's my solution. We should not only abandon these prejudices as a species, but also embrace, teach, and promote femininity culture amongst guys and other genders through raising and influence, as I believe that this will not only bring peace and non-violence towards all genders but bring us many benefits as human beings due to femininity culture being more fitting for our modern society as domestic animals.

Post Draft: Basically a lack of genetic diversity (aka monoculture) leads the human race susceptible to dangerous weather and health conditions.

The reason why we have so many different traits is so at least SOME of us can survive certain conditions (dark skin for higher weather, sexuality for population control and child care, and mental conditions for solving or avoiding problems that most "normal" people are susceptible to).

Every mutation is helpful for something. Say what you want about people with sickle cell syndrome, but at least they don't get malaria.

(I'll elaborate on this later. I also believe that fascism can lead humanity into a behavioral sink and waste resources but that's for later.)

Here's a list of a bunch of self-defense weapons that can be used if you're in a pinch.

Pepper spray

Tazers

Tranquilizers

Rocks

Branches

Darts

Heavy objects

Any body of water

Glass

Whips

Weights

Plastic bags

I'll be covering things that can be used as shields or non-lethal things that can prevent harm to you next.
Using a self-defense weapon is like punching a shark, It may not kill it but it could irritate it enough to give up pursuit.

Remember this, and don't be passive.

The first reason I came up with the idea that humans should be separated was because of their observed behavior around each other. Humans are highly intelligent, and like most intelligent animals (like otters or dolphins) they use this intellect for self-gratification or violence, whether it's 1v1 or on mass, someone somewhere is either attacking someone or wringing someone out until they have nothing to offer, even if they don't want to participate.

Just look at the news aligned to any bias or any popular prank "trend". There are bad people on all sides.

Ever wondered why every single fandom has a "loud minority"? Furthermore, why is it that whenever there are more people in a group (religion, fandom, and even political groups) it seemingly becomes more hostile to anyone outside its group or anyone who doesn't follow their normalcies? It's not a coincidence (nor is it minor, if there are fewer "toxic" people than them then why are the nicer ones the supposed "silent ones").
It's inevitable human nature.

You see we evolved from a species of apes called chimpanzees, these animals are extremely violent, especially when compared to other primates like the orangutan (who are very peaceful despite their strength). A specific behavior of the chimpanzee that I would like to point towards, is the fact that they actively hunt down the young of other primates. This is most likely to get rid of competition or to consume as much as they can (which I wouldn't doubt since they're animals who aren't very aware of the whole "consequences" thing") and may have carried over into us. Behaviors become culture, and culture slowly becomes ingrained over centuries or millennia. After all, we never stopped having wars or targeting others for being different (even if it's slight or harmless) have we?

What I'm trying to say is that the desire to or action of harming, hating, and irritating anyone who is slightly different from us may be ingrained into our blood. Our domestication of ourselves and mild cooperation with each other just aren't enough to make for the violence. It just covers it with a tiny bit of sunshine and rainbows (the same can ESPECIALLY be said for entertainment).

That's the problem with humans being social creatures. The human race is overly indulgent in desires, regardless of whether it is good for the individual and others, or not. If we rely on each other to make ourselves happy then we can end up stressing those who don't want to be involved or leave them be and stress ourselves if there are no other options. We need to strive to be self-reliant as a species, otherwise (this with overpopulation) can cause the same effects as the rat utopia experiments, exhausting and stressing eachother to the point of mass suffering and extinction.

Overindulgence also affects the landscapes around us, turning peaceful villages, beautiful forests, and even diverse and well-balanced cities into war zones, toxic areas, and cold dystopias.

Humans are also very slightly different from each other, from birth to memories and interests. In a way, it seems like we're completely incompatible with each other, yet we are still naturally social animals despite the risks. We are our own worst enemies. If we want to keep our individuality without being punished, we should stay away from each other and quell our social instincts, even if it's just a little bit for an elongated timespan, so we can eventually grow out of it or at least wait until the war is over and better manage ourselves.